Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Raynor v. C.G.C. Grocery Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 2, 1990Published

1ConcurrenceLawrence, J.

I agree with my colleagues that the defendants’ motion for summary judgment was properly denied. However, with respect to the issue of the decedent infant’s funeral expenses, I find that where recovery is sought by a parent individually, the standard of proof required to be met, as set forth in Marsico v Southland Corp. (148 AD2d 503, 505) should be followed (cf., Valicenti v Valenze, 108 AD2d 300, mod on other grounds 68 NY2d 826 [the cause of action therein was brought by the decedent’s husband, individually and as parent and guardian of their children, to recover damages for the loss of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Marsico v. Southland Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  2. Valicenti v. ValenzeNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Valicenti v. ValenzeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API