Legal Opinion

Coppersmith v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided August 6, 1959No. 63284; protest 316281-K (Los Angeles)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bao, Judge:

Paragraph 397 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 82 Treas. Dec. 305, T.D. 51802, provides for the assessment of duty at the rate of 22% per centum ad valorem, upon articles, wholly or partly manufactured, composed wholly or in chief value of base metal, not elsewhere specially provided for. The collector of customs at the port of Los Angeles invoked this provision with respect to an importation of so-called trip lever wastes, individually boxed, and assessed duty thereon accordingly.

By timely protest, plaintiffs have challenged…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Simon, Buhler & Baumann (Inc.) v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1918
  2. General Systems Service, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
  3. Border Brokerage Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lanvin Parfums, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
  2. Trans Atlantic Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  3. Nord Light, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
  4. Supply v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API