Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Nash v. Blatchford

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided January 4, 2019No. 119155Published

1ConcurrenceAtcheson, J.

I concur in the result affirming the Cowley County District Court's summary judgment in favor of Dr. Patrick T. Blatchford, M.D., the defendant in this medical malpractice action. Plaintiff Aaron Nash did not give notice as required under K.S.A. 2017 Supp. 12-105b(d), a failure the Kansas Supreme Court has determined to be a jurisdictional bar to actions governed by the Kansas Tort Claims Act regardless of their substantive merit. See Sleeth v. Sedan City Hospital , 298 Kan. 853, 868, 317 P.3d 782 (2014) ("[S]ubstantial compliance with K.S.A. 2012 Supp. 12-105b [d] is necessary before a court…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Heller v. Doe Ex Rel. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Dunn v. BlumsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Reed v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API