Legal Opinion · Dissent

Gordon, Dana, Still, Knight & Gilmore, LLC v. Jefferson County

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 5, 2010No. 1090381Published

1DissentMurdock, Justice

I am concerned that the trial court and the majority of the Court of Civil Appeals have taken a standard intended to guide the tax assessor in the performance of duties that constitute part of the process of determining the fair market value of a property — i.e., the exercise of his or her “best judgment” as to fair-market value— and substituted it for the “fair-market-value” standard itself, the standard upon which the law ultimately requires ad valo-rem taxes be based.1

My concern is based upon my reading of the entirety of the trial court’s order as quoted with approval by the Court of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Sheffield v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1997
  2. Ex Parte Uniroyal Tire Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  3. State v. Louis Pizitz Dry Goods Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1943
  4. State v. PollockSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  5. Bynum Bros. v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API