Legal Opinion

Siroty v. Nelson

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 3, 1990Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division, insofar as appealed from, should be reversed, with costs, the motion of USF&G for summary judgment on its cross claim against Dry Dock granted, the motion of plaintiff Siroty for summary judgment against Dry Dock granted, and Dry Dock’s cross motion for summary judgment dismissing Siroty’s complaint and the cross complaint of USF&G against Dry Dock denied.

Appellants Daniel Siroty and United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company (USF&G) maintain that respondent Dry Dock Savings Bank’s (Dry Dock) failure to comply with Supreme…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mtr. of Knox (Columbia Banking)New York Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Bradford Trust Co. v. Citibank, N. A.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Brown v. Flushing Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API