Bradford Trust Co. v. Citibank, N. A.
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
Although there are circumstances under which the drawer of a negotiable instrument may have a cause of action against a depositary bank that has paid over a forged but effective indorsement, Special Term correctly determined that the factors urged by plaintiff as establishing that the depositary bank wrongfully paid the instrument are insufficient to invoke that rule of liability. The subject instrument was not paid in a manner inconsistent with any restrictive indorsement (Uniform Commercial…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Mtr. of Knox (Columbia Banking)New York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Diamore Realty Corp. v. SternAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- In re KnoxAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Crick v. HSBC Bank USACivil Court of the City of New York · 2004
- Mtr. of Knox (Columbia Banking)New York Court of Appeals · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.