Legal Opinion

Kelley Trust Co. v. Paving Dist. 46 of Ft. Smith

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 19, 1931PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hart, C. J.,

(after stating the facts). The suit was brought within the time required by statute and therefore constitutes a direct attack upon the assessment of benefits. The question thus presented by' the record is mainly one of fact.

At the outset, it may be stated that the special benefit conferred upon private property by public improvement is the foundation of the power to assess it to pay the cost of the improvement. This is the only theory upon which, under our Constitution, an assessment can be justified. An assessment cannot be levied if the amount of it is in excess of the benefits…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kirst v. Street Improvement District No. 120Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1908
  2. Osborne v. Board of Improvement of Paving District No. 5Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
  3. Johnston v. ConwaySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1922
  4. Mullins v. City of Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sugarloaf Development Co. v. Heber Springs Sewer Improvement DistrictCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1991
  2. Burton v. HarrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1941
  3. Louisville Memorial Gardens, Inc. v. CarpenterCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1953
  4. Whitaker and Company v. Sewer Improvement District No. 1 of Dardanelle, ArkansasCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API