Legal Opinion

McCartney v. Tyrer

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided January 7, 1897PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from a decree of the Circuit Court of Alexandria county, pronounced July 2, 1894, in several chancery suits heard together, in one of which the appellant was the complainant, and The Potomac Electric Co., and others, were the defendants.

1Opinion of the CourtEiely, J.

*199The appellant brought suit to enforce his mechanic’s lien. One of the defences interposed to the maintenance of the suit, and the one on which it was decided by the court below, was the statute of limitations.

It is provided by section 2481, of the Code, that no suit shall be brought to enforce the mechanic’s lien “after- six months from the time when the whole amount covered by such lien has become payable.”

The account, for which the lien was perfected, bears date January 5, 1893. The memorandum for the suit was made by the clerk on July 3, 1893, and the subpoena issued by him on July 5, 1893.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. The HarrisburgSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Grattan v. WigginsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
  3. Taylor v. Cranberry Iron & Coal Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
  4. Werdenbaugh Adm'r v. ReidWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Woodyard v. PoisleyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1878

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Monk v. Exposition Deepwater Pier Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1910
  2. Pendley v. PowersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  3. Savings Bank v. Powhatan Clay Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1904
  4. Robinson v. Bass' AdministratorSupreme Court of Virginia · 1902
  5. Lamon v. GoldWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1913

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API