Legal Opinion

Greene Township Board of Supervisors v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 12, 1994No. 2161 C.D. 1993PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEWMAN, Judge.

Greene Township Board of Supervisors (Supervisors) petitions for review of an order of the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (PUC) directing Greene Township to reimburse Consolidated Rail. Corporation (Conrail) for fifty percent of the costs incurred in preparing plans, performing work and providing materials to accomplish the removal of a wooden, one lane bridge and the construction' of a roadway on a landfill at a crossing previously designated as Crossing No. 1. For the reasons set forth below, we vacate and remand the matter to the PUC.

The following facts are…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. National Fuel Gas Distribution Corp. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. City of Philadelphia v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. D & H Corp. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic-Pennsylvania, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. Greene Township Board of Supervisors v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. At & T v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. Hess v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  5. Kretschmann Farm, LLC v. Township of New SewickleyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API