Legal Opinion

Kincaid v. Detroit Mutual Insurance

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided June 2, 1987No. Docket No. 89177PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtM. J. Kelly, P.J.

What does the term "weekly compensation rate”1 include? Does it include only the benefits paid by the employer (workers’ compensation carrier) or does it also include differential benefits paid by the Second Injury Fund?

We hold that the weekly compensation rate described in § 352 includes both basic or general disability payments made by employers and weekly differential benefits paid by the Second Injury Fund. The Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board is reversed.

Decedent Dennis Kincaid suffered a work-related injury on January 12, 1970, which rendered him totally and permanently disabled. On…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. King v. Second Injury FundMichigan Supreme Court · 1969
  2. In Re Baird EstateMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Maglothin v. TRYCO STEEL CORP.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1984

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kincaid v. Detroit Mutual InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Kincaid v. Detroit Mutual InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Kincaid v. Detroit Mutual InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API