Legal Opinion

King v. Howes

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 22, 1902PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKnowlton, J.

The bill of exceptions presents the single question whether there was an error of law in the allowance of the plaintiff’s motion to amend his bill. The bill was brought to prevent the foreclosure of a mortgage of personal property and to obtain a decree for the redemption of it, on the ground that the mortgagee had refused to perform his contract, which was an important part of the consideration for the note and mortgage and for the payment of a sum of money made when the note and mortgage were given. We may assume upon the findings of the master that the plaintiff would have been entitled to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sanger v. City of NewtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883
  2. Adams v. WeeksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899
  3. Batchelder v. PierceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
  4. Gray v. Inhabitants of EverettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Day v. MillsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  2. McMurtrie v. GuilerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
  3. Narragansett Amusement Co. v. Riverside Park Amusement Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
  4. Strout v. United Shoe Machinery Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  5. Busiere v. ReillyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API