Legal Opinion
LEMUS v. MCALEENAN
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided June 3, 2021No. 1:20-cv-03344Unknown
1Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY CAMDEN VICINAGE __________________________________ : LEMUS., : : Plaintiff, : : Civil No. 20-3344 (RBK/AMD) v. : : OPINION MCALEENAN, ET AL., : : Defendants. : __________________________________ : KUGLER, United States District Judge: Presently before the Court is the Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss the Complaint (Doc. No. 13) pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and (6). For the reasons set forth below, Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. I. BACKGROUND In this case, the Court must…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Heckler v. ChaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Constitution Party of Pennsylv v. Carol AicheleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.