Legal Opinion

Trinh v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

District Court, N.D. California

Decided August 14, 1995No. C 94-20663 EAIPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE DEFENDANT MET LIFE’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

INFANTE, United States Magistrate Judge. *

I. Introduction and Background

Plaintiffs Kathleen Q. Trinh and Duane Xuan Trinh (“plaintiffs”), who are brother and sister, filed this breach of contract action in state court as third-party beneficiaries of their mother’s life insurance policy with defendant Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (“Met Life”). Met Life noticed removal of the action to federal court in San Jose and now moves for summary judgment contending that the insurance policy was void due to material…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Taylor v. Sentry Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  5. Thompson v. Occidental Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Clarendon National Insurance v. Insurance Co. of the WestDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2006
  2. Casey by & Through Casey v. Old Line Life Ins. Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1998
  3. Tran v. Kansas City Life Insurance Co.District Court, C.D. California · 2017
  4. Bahrikyan v. Transamerica Life Ins. Co.District Court, E.D. California · 2024
  5. MARKEL AMERICAN INS. CO. v. FittDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API