Braeunig v. Russell
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHerbert, J.
We first consider the question of the time allowed for argument. The applicable rule is stated in 53 American Jurisprudence, 364, Section 461, as follows:
*446“In both civil and criminal prosecutions the time allowed counsel for argument is within the sound discretion of the trial court, the exercise of which will not be interfered with by an appellate tribunal in the absence of a clear showing of its abuse to the prejudice of the substantial rights of the complaining party. The only limitation upon the discretion of the court to limit the length of arguments, however, is that the time given must…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Spriggs v. Cheyenne Newspapers, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1947
- Mitchell v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
- Jerrell v. Norfolk & Portsmouth Belt Line RailroadSupreme Court of Virginia · 1936
- Cobb Chocolate Co. v. KnudsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
- Eaton v. AskinsOhio Court of Appeals · 1953
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.