Legal Opinion

Virginia-Carolina Chemical Co. v. Kirven

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 8, 1902PublishedCited by 5 opinions

ActxoN by the Virginia-Carolina Chemical Company against J. P. Kirven,-heard by Judge O. H. Allen and a jury, a! October Term, 1901, of the Superior Court of New Han-oveb, County. From a judgment for the defendant, the plaintiff appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtFurches, C. J.

J. P. Kirven is due the plaintiff by note for guano $2,298, with interest from the 25th of October, 1898. E. E. Kirven sold Alexander Spirant & Son 100 bales of cotton, which the plaintiff has attached, or the proceeds thereof, upon the allegation that this cotton belonged to J. P. Kirven, and not to E. E. Kirven. Alexander Sprunt & Son were served as garnishee, came into Court, and alleged that they bought the cotton in good faith upon the open market in Wilmington from E. E. Kirven, who alleged that it was his cotton, and denied that it belonged to J. P. Kirven. This presented the issue…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. . BowmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879
  2. Adams v. . UtleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
  3. State v. McCourry.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1901
  4. State v. PerkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1824

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. . DegraffenreidSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  2. Blalock v. WhisnantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  3. Blalock v. . WhisnantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  4. Meekins v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  5. State v. . PerkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1824

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API