Legal Opinion

Chatham Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Reserve Research Co.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided February 11, 1947No. 5260PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHatfield, Judge

This is an appeal in a trade-mark opposition proceeding from the decision of the Commissioner of Patents, 65 USPQ 437, affirming the *887decision of the Examiner of Interferences sustaining appellee’s opposition to the registration of appellant’s mark under section 5 of the Trade-Mark Act of February 20,1905.

Appellant’s trade-mark comprises the terms “ALUMINOID” and “COLLOIDAL ALUMINA,” the term “COLLOIDAL ALUMINA” being disclaimed apart from the mark as shown.

There are other features in appellant’s mark which need not be described here because the dominant feature of appellant’s mark is the term…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ciba Pharmaceutical Products, Inc. v. Abbott LaboratoriesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1941

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lauritzen & Company, Inc. v. The Borden CompanyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956
  2. Alumatone Corp. v. Vita-Var Corp.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950
  3. Alumatone Corporation v. Vitavar CorporationCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950
  4. Alumatone Corp. v. Vita-Var Corp.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950
  5. Alumatone Corporation v. Vitavar CorporationCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API