State v. Dibble
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtBryant, Presiding Judge
{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, state of Ohio, appeals from a judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas granting the motion to suppress of defendantappellee, Lawrence A. Dibble. Because the trial court’s findings of fact support its decision to suppress the evidence the state obtained through the warrant at issue, we affirm.
I. Facts and Procedural History
{¶ 2} On February 3, 2010, Upper Arlington Police Detective Andrew Wuertz asked a Franklin County municipal court judge to approve a search warrant for *194defendant’s home. Detective Wuertz sought the warrant after speaking with two young…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- State v. DehassOhio Supreme Court · 1967
- Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. HaydenSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Herring v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. DibbleOhio Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. JacksonOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
- State v. DibbleOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
- State v. DibbleOhio Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. PerryOhio Court of Appeals · 2012