Legal Opinion
State v. Dibble
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided October 10, 2012No. 2011-1569Published
1Opinion of the Court
[Cite as State v. Dibble, 133 Ohio St.3d 451,
2012-Ohio-4630.] THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, v. DIBBLE, APPELLEE. [Cite as State v. Dibble, 133 Ohio St.3d 451,
2012-Ohio-4630.] A determination whether information in a search-warrant affidavit is false must take into account the nontechnical language used by nonlawyers. (No. 2011-1569—Submitted June 20, 2012—Decided October 10, 2012.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 10AP-648, 195 Ohio App.3d 189,
2011-Ohio-3817. __________________ SYLLABUS OF THE COURT A determination whether information in a search-warrant affidavit is…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- AAAA Enterprises, Inc. v. River Place Community Urban Redevelopment Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. WaddyOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. MorrisOhio Supreme Court · 2012
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.