Brockmeyer v. Washington National Bank
Supreme Court of Kansas
PPror from Washington District ■ Court. The opinion states the nature of the action, and the material facts. The defendant Bank demurred to plaintiff’s petition upon the ground that it did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action in favor of plaintiff, and against it. This demurrer the court sustained at the June term, 1887. Brockmeyer brings this ruling here for review.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Horton, C. J.:
Ernest Brockmeyer commenced this action against the Washington National Bank and E. C. Knowles, alleging that on April 10,1884, E. C. Knowles was carrying *377on the banking business in Hanover, in Washington county, under the name and style of The German Savings Bank; that on that day plaintiff deposited with the German Savings Bank $1,000, and the bank delivered to him a certificate of deposit therefor, payable in six months, with interest at the rate of four per cent, per annum; that soon after, Knowles closed the savings bank and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Peak v. EllicottSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
- Kelly v. . RobertsNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
- Center v. McQuestenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
- McHose v. DuttonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1881
- Simonton v. First National BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1877
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Harter v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921
- Pierson v. Swift County BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Hepler State Bank v. CoxSupreme Court of Kansas · 1931
- Cook v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1912
- Pankey v. First Nat. Bank of Hot SpringsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1936