Legal Opinion

SDC/Pullman Partners v. Tolo Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 18, 1997No. G016212PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SILLS, P. J.

I

This case centers on a toxic substance clause in a lease of land to an aerospace manufacturer. The former lessee, defendant Tolo Incorporated, manufactured fusion reactors, particle accelerator parts and radar antennas, among other things. Tolo occupied the property, which is just off the Costa Mesa Freeway, from the late 1960’s to the mid-1990’s. It began leasing the land from plaintiff SDC/Pullman Partners in 1985 after a sale-leaseback deal. The lease was renewed in July 1989. It is that lease 1 which contains the clause in question.

Quite remarkably—for an aerospace…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Wickard v. FilburnSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Bowers v. HardwickSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Industrial Union Dept., AFL-CIO v. American Petroleum InstituteSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Amoco Oil Company v. Borden, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Karl Storz Endoscopy-America, Inc. v. Integrated Medical Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  2. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. RenzDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2011
  3. Eith v. Ketelhut, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  4. Eith v. KetelhutCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
  5. Eith v. KetelhutCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API