Legal Opinion
Roefs v. Roefs
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 6, 2012PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Malone Jr.,
Following a hearing, Family Court determined that the matter should be treated as a modification proceeding, and concluded that while there have been significant developments since the existing custody arrangement was put into place by Supreme Court, those developments do not justify a change in custody. The mother appeals.
Initially, Family Court correctly determined that because the custody arrangement ordered by Supreme Court in the divorce action followed from a plenary hearing and “reflects a considered and experienced judgment concerning all of the factors involved”…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Friederwitzer v. FriederwitzerNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Dintruff v. McGreevyNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- Diffin v. TowneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Gitchell v. GitchellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Bessette v. PeltonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Greene v. RobargeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Matter of Thomas BB. v. Jessica YY.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023
- Matter of Turner v. TurnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018
- Samantha J.M. v. Anthony T.C.New York City Family Court · 2013
- Greene v. RobargeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013