Legal Opinion

Winston Hartwell v. Allied Chemical Corporation, Parent Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided March 29, 1972No. 71-1161PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

In this case, plaintiff seeks damages for injuries arising out of an accident occurring at his place of employment. The ease is in federal court based on the diversity of citizenship of the parties. In the District Court, defendants Allied Chemical Corp. and Industrial Chemical Co. moved to dismiss the complaint, which motion was construed by the District Court as one for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 F.R.Civ.P., and was granted. Plaintiff has appealed. 1

On August 9, 1968, plaintiff, Winston Hartwell, was seriously injured during the course of his employment. He was…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Scott v. C. E. Powell Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  2. Perez v. Blumenthal Bros. Choc. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  3. Hazy v. Pittsburgh Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956

4Cited by14 opinions

  1. Neal v. Carey Canadian Mines, Ltd.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Kline v. Arden H. Verner Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Nicklos v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1972
  4. Taynton v. DershamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Kline v. Arden H. Verner Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API