Legal Opinion

Air Tour Acquisition Corp. v. United States

District Court, D. Hawaii

Decided July 23, 1991No. Civ. 88-00575 ACKPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

KAY, Chief Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This action was filed by Plaintiff (Air Tour) challenging a claim against it by the Defendant, Internal Revenue Service (IRS). The IRS claimed Air Tour owed additional federal excise tax due on air transportation for the period from October 1, 1982 to June 30, 1984. The IRS claimed that Air Tour was liable for the tax based on 26 U.S.C. §§ 4261-63, 4291, and 7501(a). Air Tour brings this Motion for Summary Judgment claiming that it is not liable as a matter of law for the tax the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Begier v. Internal Revenue ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. British Airways Board, 1 v. The Boeing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. American Airlines, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
  2. Central De Gas De Chihuahua, S.A. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1994
  3. Lake Mead Air, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1997
  4. Continental Airlines, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  5. Central De Gas De Chihuahua, S.A. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API