Legal Opinion

Roberts v. Hughes

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 27, 1983No. 81-939PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FAULKNER, Justice.

This case involves the application of ARCP 17(a) to a subrogation case. Roberts sued Hughes and Super Valu Stores for injuries he received in a traffic collision. Excalibur Insurance Company filed a motion to intervene and a complaint to assert its subrogation rights arising out of its payments of collision and workmen’s compensation benefits to Roberts. The motion was granted and Excalibur was added as a party plaintiff. Prior to the trial, Excalibur and Roberts entered into an agreement whereby Roberts agreed to pay Excalibur $23,888.87 out of, and only out of, any…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. McNeil Construction Company, a Corporation v. The Livingston State Bank, a Montana State BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
  3. Watsontown Brick Co. v. Hercules Powder Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1962
  4. Smith v. SpringsteenCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1980

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ex Parte HowellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  2. Abbott v. Allstate Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  3. Capitol Fuels, Inc. v. Clark Equipment Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Abbott v. Allstate Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  5. Ex Parte HowellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API