A.A.L., Inc. v. Colonial Pipeline Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Smith, Presiding Judge.
A jury found in favor of Colonial Pipeline Company (Colonial) on A.A.L., Inc.’s (A.A.L.) claim for tortious interference with contract. The jury also determined the width of Colonial’s easement over A.A.L.’s property. On appeal, A.A.L. challenges the trial court’s denial of its motion for directed verdict. A.A.L. also enumerates as error several of the trial court’s evidentiary rulings and its instruction on tortious interference. We find no error and affirm.
The evidence shows that in 1962, A.A.L.’s predecessors in title granted Colonial a right-of-way easement over the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Brownlee v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
- Cooper Tire & Rubber Co. v. CrosbySupreme Court of Georgia · 2001
- Quiktrip Corp. v. ChildsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
- Lee v. BartusekCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
- Gordon v. Athens Convalescent Center, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ford Motor Co. v. ReeseCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
- Doreika v. BlotnerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
- Smith v. CSX Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
- Doreika v. BlotnerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
- Larry G. Smith v. Csx Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2013