Legal Opinion

Rutledge v. Rutledge

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 8, 1953No. Civ. 19532PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.

In an action for an accounting and partition of certain real and personal property held jointly by plaintiff and defendant, plaintiff appeals from that part of an amended decree (judgment) requiring her to pay her portion of a tax lien deficiency in connection with an income tax return on community property, which return was filed while the parties were husband and wife but the deficiency was not assessed until after they had been divorced.

Defendant also appeals from the same decree.

Plaintiff’s Appeal

Facts: Plaintiff and defendant were married in 1914, and divorced in 1949. In 1947, defendant…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Spier v. LangCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Kinard v. JordanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Takahashi v. Fish & Game CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Lee v. SilvaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Linstead v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hunter v. SchultzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  2. Murchison v. MurchisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  3. Teixeira v. VerissimoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  4. Patten-Blinn Lumber Co. v. FrancisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  5. Rutledge v. RutledgeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API