Legal Opinion

Stansbury v. Frazer

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 10, 1920No. Civ. No. 2119Published

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County directing the release of a portion of bonds previously directed to be held to satisfy judgment. Dana R. Weller, Judge. Reversed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.

On the twenty-ninth day of July, 1918, on the application of respondent Hoffman, the superior court of the county of Los Angeles made the following order:

“The motion of Fred Hoffman, by his attorney, John B. Haas, for the release of certain bonds now in the custody of the Clerk of this Court, having come on regularly to be heard on the 27th day of July, 1918, and it satisfactorily appearing to the Court, that there is now being held by said Clerk, $4,000.00 of street bonds and interest coupons attached thereto to satisfy a judgment in the sum of $2,332.00 obtained in the above entitled…

2Cases cited6 opinions

Barnhart v. EdwardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
Stewart v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
In Re Estate of DeanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
Ruggles v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
Stateler v. Superior Court of Alameda Cty.California Supreme Court · 1895

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.