Legal Opinion

McCourt v. Culkin

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 25, 1979No. Civ. A. 76-3996PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

RAYMOND J. BRODERICK, District Judge.

Plaintiff instituted this habeas corpus proceeding to challenge his having been ordered to two years of active duty in the United States Navy in an enlisted status following his disenrollment from the Naval Reserve Officers Training Corps (NROTC) Program at Villanova University. Presently before the Court is defendants’ motion to dismiss pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, 1 which the Court has treated as a motion for summary judgment because the following matters outside the pleadings…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Unemployment Compensation Comm'n of Alaska v. AragonSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Wasson v. TrowbridgeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
  4. National Industrial Sand Ass'n v. MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
  5. Richard E. Keister, Jr., Private (E-2) v. The Honorable Stanley Resor, Secretary of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dougherty v. HidalgoDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Wronke v. MarshDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 1985
  3. Kolesa v. LehmanDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API