Legal Opinion
National Industrial Sand Ass'n v. Marshall
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided May 16, 1979No. Nos. 78-2446, 79-1159PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
GARTH, Circuit Judge.
We are presented on this appeal with challenges by mine operators and by miners to training regulations which have been promulgated by the Secretary of Labor.
Section 115 of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 (Mine Act),1 requires every mine operator to have a health and safety training program for miners. Each program must be approved by the Secretary of Labor (Secretary). The Secretary is required to publish regulations governing such programs. In accordance with this requirement, regulations were published by the Secretary on October 13,…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- National Ass'n of Regulatory Utility Commissioners v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
- Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of Labor v. Carolina Stalite Company, (Two Cases.)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
- National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Ad Hoc Telecommunications Users Committee, Intervenors. Public Service Commission of the District of Columbia v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, United Telephone System, Inc., Intervenors. People of the State of California and the Public Utilities Commission of the State of California v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Southern Pacific Communications Company, Intervenors. MCI Telecommunications Corporation v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Aeronautical Radio, Inc., Intervenors. Lexitel Corporation v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, United Telephone Systems, Inc., Intervenors. Western Union Telegraph Company v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, MCI Telecommunications Corporation, Intervenors. North American Telephone Association v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Gte Sprint Communications Corporation, Intervenors. MCI Telecommunications Corporation v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Gte Service Corporation, Intervenors. Public Service Commission of the District of Columbia v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Gte Sprint Communications Corporation, Intervenors. Aeronautical Radio, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Western Union Telegraph Company, Intervenors. United States Transmission Systems, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Gte Sprint Communications Corporation, Intervenors. Telesphere Network, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, American Broadcasting Companies, Intervenors. Association of Long Distance Telephone Companies v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Western Union Telegraph Company, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
- Louisiana Forestry Ass'n Inc. v. Secretary United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
- Joy Technologies, Inc. v. Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.