Legal Opinion
Springer v. Rancourt
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided August 15, 2001No. 01-5005PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
HENRY, Circuit Judge.
After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir.R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
Appellant Lindsey K. Springer sought to have his name placed on the presidential ballots of all fifty States. When his requests were either rejected or ignored, he sued the fifty States. That suit was dismissed based on the States’ sovereign immunity, which was upheld on appeal.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Camfield v. City of Oklahoma CityCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- Harry E. Brownlee and Roy M. Waddell v. Lear Siegler Management Services Corp., a Foreign CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- Weldon v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1994
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. SpringerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020