Legal Opinion

State v. West

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 2000No. E1997-00166-SC-R11-PDPublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

OPINION

2Opinion of the Court · BirchBirch, J.

in which ANDERSON, C.J., and DROWOTA, HOLDER, and BARKER, JJ., joined.

We accepted review in this case to resolve the apparent conflict between Rule 52(b) of the Tennessee Rules of Criminal Procedure and Tenn.Code Ann. § 40-30-111 (1990) (repealed 1995), which limits the scope of review in post-conviction proceedings. In order to resolve this issue, we will also address whether the plain error rule should apply to claims deemed “previously determined” or “waived” under TenmCode Ann. § 40-30-112 (1990) (repealed 1995). We find that the appellant’s (Stephen Michael West) current claim,…

3Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Archer v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. MixonTennessee Supreme Court · 1999
  3. House v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. TaylorTennessee Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State v. CarterTennessee Supreme Court · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by53 opinions

  1. Grindstaff v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Van Tran v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Webb v. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  4. Gary Bradford Cone v. Ricky Bell, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
  5. Clifton A. Lake v. The Memphis Landsmen, LLCTennessee Supreme Court · 2013

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API