Hastings v. Champer
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Chief Justice.
Appellant was plaintiff below and appel-lee was defendant, below, so they will be given the same designation here. Plaintiff instituted this suit in form of trespass to try title against defendant for title and possession of Lot 5, Block 1, Alamo Addition to City of Longview. Defendant’s answer consisted of a general demurrer, general denial, plea of not guilty, and cross action against plaintiff for the sum of $285.50, alleging “that by virtue of said above-mentioned agreement (to exchange city lots) the said cross defendant, Hastings, became bound and obligated and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Self v. KingTexas Supreme Court · 1866
- Magnolia Warehouse & Storage Co. v. DavisTexas Supreme Court · 1917
- McCormick v. KampmannTexas Supreme Court · 1908
- Jefferson Cotton Oil & Fertilizer Co. v. CongletonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
- Heldenfels v. School Trustees of School Dist. No. 7, San Patricio CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
3Cited by1 opinion
- Fannin State Bank v. GrossmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1961