Jewell v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
.Opinion of the Court by
Chief Justice Sampson—
Affirming,
Appellant, Mary Jewell, convicted in the Daviess circuit court of the offense of selling intoxicating liquors *630and fined $300.00 and imprisoned sixty days, insists that the' judgment should be reversed because (1) it is flagrantly against the weight of the evidence; (2) that the trial-court should have sustained her motion for a directed verdict in her favor at the conclusion of the evidence, and (3.) because the case is wholly without merit. We will treat these questions together because of their similarity of nature.
The Commonwealth…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gordon v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
- Kennedy & Wigginton v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
- Mattingly v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
- Hutchcraft v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
- Commonwealth v. LittleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Triplett v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932