Legal Opinion

Wallace v. Spray

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided September 18, 1956No. 48994PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHays, J.

Plaintiff asks that a certain instrument termed an “agreement”, Exhibit A in the record, be reformed to' speak the real agreement between the parties; and in the alternative, for a partial rescission thereof. Defendant denies that the “agreement” fails to state the true agreement; pleads that plaintiff is estopped to have relief; and, by way of affirmative relief, asks that the court decree the “agreement” to be the true contract and establish it as such. The trial court held plaintiff had failed to establish his claim by clear, satisfactory and convincing proof, and also that he was estopped…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Preston v. HowellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1934
  2. Snyder v. IvesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1875
  3. Salmon v. Farm Property Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1915
  4. Kowalke v. EvernhamSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
  5. Houchin v. AuracherSupreme Court of Iowa · 1922

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Scheel v. Superior Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1958
  2. Kufer v. CarsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1975
  3. Akkerman v. GersemaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1967
  4. NATIONAL FIRE INSURANCE CO. OF HARTFORD v. ButlerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1967
  5. Schoenthal v. SwebakkenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1960

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API