Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Park Plaza Shopping Center, Inc. v. O'Malley

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1973No. 104PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The question in this case is whether there is sufficient support in the record for the determination of the board of review. We conclude there is. The improvements and land were valued separately as required under State ex rel. Gisholt Machine Co. v. Norsman (1919), 168 Wis. 442, 169 N. W. 429. The land was valued on the basis of comparable sales, which is the best information of market value after an actual sale of the property itself. State ex rel. Markarian v. Cudahy (1970), 45 Wis. 2d 688, 178 N. W. 2d 627. The relator made no objection to any of the comparable sales offered by the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Markarian v. City of CudahyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  2. State ex rel. Gisholt Machine Co. v. NorsmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Coney v. Milwaukee & Suburban Transport Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
  4. State ex rel. Cameron v. RobertsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1894
  5. SUPERIOR NURSING HOMES, INC. v. WausauWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Ruthenberg v. Annuity & Pension Board of City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  2. State Ex Rel. Harding v. Door County Board of AdjustmentCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1985
  3. Casteel v. KolbCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1993
  4. Casteel v. KolbCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API