Legal Opinion
Hansen v. Abrasive Engineering & Manufacturing, Inc.
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided August 12, 1993No. CC 87-CV-0302-TM; CA A61214; SC S39226Published
1Opinion of the Court
856 P.2d 625 (1993)
317 Or. 378
Timothy R. HANSEN, Respondent on Review,
v.
ABRASIVE ENGINEERING AND MANUFACTURING, INC., a foreign corporation, Petitioner on Review, and
Akhurst Machinery, Inc., an Oregon corporation, Defendant.
No. CC 87-CV-0302-TM; CA A61214; SC S39226.
Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.
Argued and Submitted November 2, 1992.
Decided August 12, 1993.
William E. Flinn, of William E. Flinn Associates, Eugene, argued the cause for petitioner on review. With him on the petition was John R. Osborn, Eugene.
John R. Faust, Jr., Portland, argued the cause for respondent on review. The…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Thomas Carey v. Bahama Cruise LinesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
- State Ex Rel. Western Seed Production Corp. v. CampbellOregon Supreme Court · 1968
- Bellikka v. GreenOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- Shahtout v. Emco Garbage Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1985
- Hansen v. Abrasive Engineering & Manufacturing, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.