Legal Opinion

People v. O'ROARK

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 5, 1998No. B093085PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

NOTT, J.

William Mark O’Roark appealed from the judgment entered following a jury trial that resulted in his conviction of three counts of second degree robbery (Pen. Code, § 211) with findings that he used a firearm in the commission of each robbery (Pen. Code, § 12022.5, subd. (a)). The jury also found that he had three prior serious or violent felony convictions within the meaning of Penal Code section 667, subdivisions (b) through (i) (the legislative version of the three strikes law), 1 that he had three prior serious felony convictions within the meaning of Penal Code section 667,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. Superior Court (Romero)California Supreme Court · 1996
  2. People v. SipeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  3. People v. AndersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  4. People v. ButlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  5. Gonzales v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. JamesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  2. Braziel v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2014
  3. People v. FletcherCalifornia Supreme Court · 2025
  4. People v. Simon CA2/6California Court of Appeal · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API