Legal Opinion

Peters v. Speeflo Manufacturing Corp.

District Court, E.D. Louisiana

Decided May 16, 1984No. Civ. A. 83-714PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

DUPLANTIER, District Judge.

Resolving an issue as to which there is apparently no controlling precedent, we hold that an employer who has paid medical expenses and compensation benefits under the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act cannot claim reimbursement out of the funds resulting from a settlement entered into between the employee and an alleged third-party tortfeasor, where the terms of the settlement specifically provide otherwise and reserve the right of the employer to proceed with its claim against the third party for reimbursement of the amounts…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. the EtnaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1943
  2. Bloomer v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Jackson Brewing Company v. HerpelCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  4. Pallas Shipping Agency, Ltd. v. DurisSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Jimmy Allen v. Texaco, Inc., North-West Insurance Company, Intervenor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Charles Miller v. Rowan Companies, Inc. And Tri-State Oil Tool Industries, Inc., DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API