Legal Opinion

Christenson v. Struss

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 31, 2006No. 46A03-0603-CV-131PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DARDEN, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Tara Christenson appeals the trial court's order overruling her objection to having the trial judge conduct a hearing on Jill Struss's motion to correct error from a permanent protective order that was signed and issued by the trial judge as opposed to having the magistrate, who conducted the protective order hearing and made recommendations to the judge, conduct the hearing.

We affirm.

ISSUE

Whether the trial judge erred by conducting the hearing on a motion to correct error from an order where a magistrate entered findings and the trial judge signed…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Chamberlain v. WalpoleIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Mid-West Federal Savings Bank v. EppersonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Higgason v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. Tener v. TenerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. Wilson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1988

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. City of Indianapolis v. Hicks ex rel. RichardsIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. Johnson v. JohnsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. Konger v. SchillaceIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Knightstown Banner, LLC v. Town of KnightstownIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. John D. May v. Erik C. Allen (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2016

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API