Legal Opinion

Konger v. Schillace

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 23, 2007No. 02A03-0610-CV-500PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NAJAM, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Mary C. Konger (“Mary”) brings this interlocutory appeal, pursuant to Indiana Appellate Rule 14(A)(1), from the trial court’s order that she pay the full principal and interest on a line of credit secured by real property in which she holds a life estate. Mary raises a single issue for our review, which we restate as the following two issues:

1. Whether Mary timely filed a contingent claim against the estate of her late husband for contribution payments on the line of credit.

2. Whether the trial court abused its discretion in denying Mary’s Petition to…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Monroe Guaranty Insurance Co. v. Magwerks Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 2005
  2. American Family Insurance Co. v. Ford Motor Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 2006
  3. McLochlin v. MillerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1966
  4. Oldham v. NobleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1946
  5. Tippecanoe County v. Indiana Manufacturer's Ass'nIndiana Supreme Court · 2003

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Stuart Reed and Michael Reed v. Michael CassadyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015
  2. Small v. RogersIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. Richards v. Copes-Vulcan, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2019
  4. Richards v. Copes-Vulcan, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API