Legal Opinion
Larry Zapp v. United Transportation Union and Consolidated Rail Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided February 6, 1984No. 81-3072PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CUDAHY, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs appeal from the judgment of the district court dismissing their Third Amended Complaint against their Union, the United Transportation Union (the “UTU”), and their employer, the Consolidated Rail Corporation (“Conrail”). We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
I. The Parties
Plaintiffs are 126 individual engineers and trainmen (this is not a class action) formerly employed by the Indianapolis Union Railway Company (the “IU”), a “belt-line” industry and interchange railroad circling Indianapolis. The IU…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Abilene Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Far East Conference v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Czosek v. O'MARASupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Merrild Augspurger v. Brotherhood of Locomotive EngineersCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- H. Jack Frandsen v. Brotherhood Of Railway, Airline And Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express And Station EmployeesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Purcell v. Janikowski (In Re Janikowski)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1986
- Miller v. Krause (In Re Krause)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana · 1988
- William A. Rilling v. Burlington Northern Railroad Company, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Engelhardt v. Consolidated Rail Corp.District Court, N.D. New York · 1984
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.