Legal Opinion

Woodman v. Ackerman

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 22, 1967No. Civ. No. 23703PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtElkington, J.

This is an appeal from orders of the superior court, in a corporate shareholders’ derivative action, granting motions of defendants below and respondents here, that plaintiffs (appellants here) be required to furnish security in accordance with the provisions of Corporations Code section 834.

Section 834 provides a procedure in a shareholders’ derivative suit for requiring a plaintiff therein to furnish security for the ‘ probable reasonable expenses ’ ’ of certain defendants. The section states in part that such defendants “shall have recourse to such security in such amount as the court…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. People v. EggersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Sjoberg v. HastorfCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Lyon v. GossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Berri v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Woodman v. AckermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API