Campbell v. Rogers

The plaintiff, Campbell, having taken by assignment all interest in this matter that Mrs. Humiston had, asserts in this action a right to recover against defendant Rogers upon his deed of October, 1919, to Mrs. Humis-ton and Fox, the necessary incident expenses and the amount recovered by Mrs. Olsen upon the breach of warranty in the deed of October, 1922, to her. His complaint was framed upon such theory, although facts were therein recited and testified to upon the trial as to Rogers being requested to actas attorney for Mrs. Humiston and plaintiff in the former action; that he declined so…