Legal Opinion

Smith v. Hermsen

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1997No. NonePublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMUNDSON, Justice.

[¶ 1.] Harold and Dolores Smith (Smiths) sued Albert and Joyce Hermsen (Hermsens) for rescission of a land sale after it was discovered that a mortgage was attached to the property. After Hermsens failed to file a timely answer, Smiths were granted a default judgment. The trial court denied Hermsens’ motion to set aside default and request for leave to file answer. Hermsens appeal and we reverse and remand.

FACTS

[¶ 2.] Hermsens owned approximately thirty-five acres of real estate near Winner, South Dakota. After initial refusals, Herm-sens agreed to sell to Smiths a six-acre…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Jacobellis v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Moss v. GuttormsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Butler v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Marziliano v. HecklerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
  5. LDL Cattle Co., Inc. v. GuetterSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Upper Plains Contracting Inc. v. Pepsi AmericasSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Colton Lumber Co. v. SiemonsmaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Brevet International, Inc. v. Great Plains Luggage Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Action Carrier, Inc. v. United National Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Meier v. McCordSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API