Smith v. Hermsen
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
AMUNDSON, Justice.
[¶ 1.] Harold and Dolores Smith (Smiths) sued Albert and Joyce Hermsen (Hermsens) for rescission of a land sale after it was discovered that a mortgage was attached to the property. After Hermsens failed to file a timely answer, Smiths were granted a default judgment. The trial court denied Hermsens’ motion to set aside default and request for leave to file answer. Hermsens appeal and we reverse and remand.
FACTS
[¶ 2.] Hermsens owned approximately thirty-five acres of real estate near Winner, South Dakota. After initial refusals, Herm-sens agreed to sell to Smiths a six-acre…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Jacobellis v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Moss v. GuttormsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- Butler v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1989
- Marziliano v. HecklerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- LDL Cattle Co., Inc. v. GuetterSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Upper Plains Contracting Inc. v. Pepsi AmericasSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- Colton Lumber Co. v. SiemonsmaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- Brevet International, Inc. v. Great Plains Luggage Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Action Carrier, Inc. v. United National Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Meier v. McCordSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.