Legal Opinion

Guillen v. Kitching

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 24, 1978No. 76-2200PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KEHOE, Judge.

Appellants, plaintiffs below, bring this appeal from a summary judgment dated July 31, 1975, entered by the trial court in favor of appellees, defendants below.

Appellants’ basic contention on appeal is that the trial court erred, in granting appellees’ motion for summary judgment against the claims of appellants Hector and Sylvia Guillen, because it misinterpreted the word “survivors” in Section 768.-18, Florida Statutes (1975). The trial court interpreted the word “survivors” as follows:

“That notwithstanding the liberal construction to be applied in accordance with Florida…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Duval v. HuntSupreme Court of Florida · 1894
  2. Ham v. Heintzelman's Ford, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971
  3. Turner Produce Co. v. Lake Shore Growers Coop. Ass'nDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
  4. Wesley Construction Co. v. LaneDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
  5. Burgh v. CarrollDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cinghina v. RacikDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  2. In Re the Complaint of DFDS Seaways (Bahamas) Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1987
  3. Owens v. JacksonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API