Burgh v. Carroll
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
PEARSON, Judge.
Mr. and Mrs. Burgh appeal a summary final judgment entered for the appellee, James D. Carroll. The Burghs sued Carroll under the wrongful death statute, § 768.01, Fla.Stat., F.S.A. The trial judge ruled that they were not entitled to maintain the action because they were not dependents within the meaning of § 768.02, Fla.Stat., F.S.A.
Harry Gangler, age 53, was killed June 3, 1967, when he was struck by an automobile owned and driven by James D. Carroll. He had been living with his niece Patricia Burgh, her husband, Robert Burgh, and the Burghs’ children for ten to twelve years…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Duval v. HuntSupreme Court of Florida · 1894
- W. B. Harbeson Lumber Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
- Benoit v. Miami Beach Electric Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1923
- Wadsworth v. FriendDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
- Self v. Sinclair Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1934
3Cited by3 opinions
- Cinghina v. RacikDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
- In Re the Complaint of DFDS Seaways (Bahamas) Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1987
- Guillen v. KitchingDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978