Legal Opinion

Opinion No. (1991)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports

Decided May 6, 1991Published

1Opinion of the Court

Dear Chairman Ephraim,

¶ 0 The Attorney General has received your letter asking for an official opinion addressing, in effect, the following question:

Is the State Board of Public Accountancy required to transferten percent of its gross fees to the General Revenue Fundannually?

¶ 1 Your question reflects the apparent conflict between 62O.S. 211 (1981), which provides:

All self-sustaining boards created by statute to regulate and prescribe standards, practices, and procedures in any profession, occupation or vocation, shall at the close of each fiscal year hereafter file with the Governor and the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Magnolia Pipe Line Co. v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
  2. City of Tulsa v. SmittleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  3. Reubin v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
  4. Smith v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  5. McLean v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API