Markowitz v. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
The following opinion was filed February 9, 1937:
Fairchild, J.
The difficulties experienced by the trial court in this case are fully appreciated. The testimony of plaintiff of severe injuries; the likelihood of their having occurred through her own fault or misfortune; the fact that *350no one supposes it is the purpose of the law to permit one to claim anything he finds necessary to sustain his case and to consider that claim evidence; the knowledge that such words as “awful” as in common use very often are exaggerations of speech, and when inquired into are found not to mean severe and…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Paulsen v. GundersenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
- Hanley v. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
- Johnson v. WilsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1839
- Gross Coal Co. v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1920
3Cited by4 opinions
- Loomans v. Milwaukee Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
- Markowitz v. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
- Edith P. Reitan v. Travelers Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1959
- Edith P. Reitan v. Travelers Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1959