Earth Island Institute v. United States Forest Service
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judge:
Under the National Forest Management Act (“NFMA”), an agency’s project is required to comply with 1982 viability requirements only to the extent they have been incorporated in the relevant forest plan. Earth Island Inst. v. Carlton, 626 F.3d 462, 470 (9th Cir.2010). Here, we conclude that the Lake Tahoe Forest Plan did not require the Forest Service to demonstrate at the project level that the Angora Fire Restoration Project (“Angora Project”) would maintain viable population levels of management indicator species, including the black-backed woodpecker.…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Ohio Forestry Assn., Inc. v. Sierra ClubSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- The Lands Council v. McNairCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Earth Island Institute v. CarltonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. Christopher SavageCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Earth Island Institute v. UsfsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
- California v. United States Bureau of Land ManagementDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2017
- Becerra v. United States Department of the InteriorDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2017
- Native Ecosystems Council v. KruegerDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2013
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.