Legal Opinion

Rekovsky v. Glisczinski

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 25, 1927No. 25,415PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Taylor, O.

Plaintiff brought this action under the statute authorizing the partition of real property held in cotenancy and appeals from an order sustaining a demurrer to her complaint.

It appears from the complaint that plaintiff and defendant Martha Glisczinski are respectively the widow and daughter of Joseph Rekovsky, deceased; that they are his only heirs; that he died intestate seized of a tract of land in LeSueur county containing slightly less than 80 acres; .that this land was his homestead; and that the probate court by its final decree has assigned the land to plaintiff for and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Love v. BlauwSupreme Court of Kansas · 1900
  2. Smith v. RunnelsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
  3. Seiders v. GilesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891
  4. Heintz v. WilhelmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Baskins v. KrepcikNebraska Supreme Court · 1950
  2. In Re Estate of AblanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
  3. Baskins v. KrepcikNebraska Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Marian v. Swanson v. Terrence K. SwansonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
  5. Rekovsky v. GlisczinskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API