Rekovsky v. Glisczinski
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Taylor, O.
Plaintiff brought this action under the statute authorizing the partition of real property held in cotenancy and appeals from an order sustaining a demurrer to her complaint.
It appears from the complaint that plaintiff and defendant Martha Glisczinski are respectively the widow and daughter of Joseph Rekovsky, deceased; that they are his only heirs; that he died intestate seized of a tract of land in LeSueur county containing slightly less than 80 acres; .that this land was his homestead; and that the probate court by its final decree has assigned the land to plaintiff for and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Love v. BlauwSupreme Court of Kansas · 1900
- Smith v. RunnelsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
- Seiders v. GilesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891
- Heintz v. WilhelmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
3Cited by5 opinions
- Baskins v. KrepcikNebraska Supreme Court · 1950
- In Re Estate of AblanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
- Baskins v. KrepcikNebraska Supreme Court · 1950
- Marian v. Swanson v. Terrence K. SwansonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
- Rekovsky v. GlisczinskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928